Time for gamers to get political!

As Americans, it is our civic duty to vote. However, as gamers we often feel chastised by politicians and their views on videogames. Now is our time to rise up and be heard. Yahoo games is trying to inform gamers as to which candidate will help defend our rights to frag.

I know what you are thinking: “If I’m old enough to vote, none of these game laws affect me.” They may not affect you directly, but if these laws start getting signed, larger retailers might start pulling games off shelves which would hurt the entire industry. Take Manhunt 2, for instance. When I went to pick up my copy at my local Target, they informed me that they weren’t carrying the game due to its controversial nature. If the government starts regulating videogames, who knows what they will deem “unsuitable” for public consumption?

As a politically savvy young person, I really find this guide useful. You don’t often hear politicians talking about their stance on games until something like GTA:SA’s “Hot Coffee” incident, so it’s hard to tell who will defend my right to buy a good game. I’m not going to make my decision based solely on games, but considering that I hope to make a living making, testing, and writing about them, games are a major issue for me.

Hopefully other gamers will find the time to put down their controllers when election day comes around, and stand up for their right to game.

http://videogames.yahoo.com/feature/play-the-vote/1182822
 
Fr0dus Maximus said:
Take Manhunt 2, for instance. When I went to pick up my copy at my local Target, they informed me that they weren’t carrying the game due to its controversial nature. If the government starts regulating videogames, who knows what they will deem “unsuitable” for public consumption?
http://videogames.yahoo.com/feature/play-the-vote/1182822

Isn't Target deciding not to carry Manhunt 2 a decision made by private enterprise that is in no way affiliated with government policy?
 
stealth toilet said:
Isn't Target deciding not to carry Manhunt 2 a decision made by private enterprise that is in no way affiliated with government policy?

Can't private enterprises be effected by government policy?
 
Fr0dus Maximus said:
Can't private enterprises be effected by government policy?

Yeah, I guess your example just kind of showed how it might not even take government intervention for distributors to choose not to carry certain games.
 
Polygon said:
While I consider their opinion on gaming I find it one of the thing on the bottom of the list.

It's also one of the things on the bottom of mine but, as I've seen with my family and friends I see more and more people closed minded on things. So if I brought this up on forums and in conversations with the people I know maybe it would be a signal for people to open their eyes and actually make an informed decision on things instead of just voting because "oh he's black, so I won't vote for him", "I'm voting for her because she's a women", "won't vote for them because their Republican" or "won't vote for them because their Democrat".

EDIT: @Stealth: Maybe I should've worded that better. n_n
 
Like Polygon, a politician's opinion on gaming holds little importance to me, although this just gives me another reason to like Edwards. :D

stealth toilet said:
Yeah, I guess your example just kind of showed how it might not even take government intervention for distributors to choose not to carry certain games.
Yeah, there are millions of crazy soccer moms, who could do that through boycotts.
 
Fr0dus Maximus said:
It's also one of the things on the bottom of mine but, as I've seen with my family and friends I see more and more people closed minded on things. So if I brought this up on forums and in conversations with the people I know maybe it would be a signal for people to open their eyes and actually make an informed decision on things instead of just voting because "oh he's black, so I won't vote for him", "I'm voting for her because she's a women", "won't vote for them because their Republican" or "won't vote for them because their Democrat".

EDIT: @Stealth: Maybe I should've worded that better. n_n

In case your comment about a black candidate was directed at Obama, he's not black. However, I do like Obama's views on technology compared to any of the other candidates running. Right now I'd just be happy if Clinton loses. She's good at talking but has no plan on how to carry out all that talk.
 
Weird, I thought he was black. :lol

I like Obama actually. I'm not American, so I can't vote, but out of all the candidates I've seen he's earned my non-existant vote.
 
stealth toilet said:
Weird, I thought he was black. :lol
He's half black.

Now that Edwards is out, Obama is starting to look pretty appealing to me. I would vote for either him or McCain, but I'm underage of course. So my brother who just turned 18, and knows all of two candidates can vote, but I, who actually pays attention to politics, can't. Gotta love America. ::)
 
Homicidal Cherry53 said:
Now that Edwards is out, Obama is starting to look pretty appealing to me. I would vote for either him or McCain, but I'm underage of course. So my brother who just turned 18, and knows all of two candidates can vote, but I, who actually pays attention to politics, can't. Gotta love America. ::)

Ur in the same boat as me then.
 
Just remember that when piliticians in the national arena start talking about games, they are simply politicing. Nothing more than making themselves more appealing to the voting masses. And when local or state governments pass laws that infringe upon the gaming industry, lawsuits get filed, and nine times out of ten a federal judge blocks the law and it fades out of existence.

I understand that this sounds like I am giving an excuse for someone to be complacant, but it's the standard course of action when government steps in and dances with big industry.

Homicidal Cherry53 said:
Yeah basically. I can't tell you how annoying it is to watch a bunch of idiots go make decisions that effect me, and I can't do a thing about it.

Unfortunately, that is the life of a minor. Good thing is when you turn 18, you can jump into the political arena and get rid of politicians who do this to minors.
 
Homicidal Cherry53 said:
Yeah basically. I can't tell you how annoying it is to watch a bunch of idiots go make decisions that effect me, and I can't do a thing about it.

It's even worse when you try to help them vote intelligently and in the end it was all for nothing.
 
Try being in another country and watching the American elections take place knowing how much their policies will affect the rest of the world.

It doesn't seem fair that only one country's populace gets a vote in an election that has such far reaching ramifications.
 
stealth toilet said:
Try being in another country and watching the American elections take place knowing how much their policies will affect the rest of the world.

It doesn't seem fair that only one country's populace gets a vote in an election that has such far reaching ramifications.
Well, if you would prefer, we could just annex the rest of the world. :lol
 
I think I'd rather that Canada annexed the US. :D We can be the United States of South Canada.
 
Back
Top