a question about magazine game reviews

Yea this reminds of when MGS got a 10 and Halo got a 9.5 or 9.25 {can't remember}, either way I was super pissed. Sure I liked MGS but damn, better than Halo? I think not. GI is not consistent and it really is apparent now. Simply put, you just can't trust em'. For example, according to GI, "Harry Potter: Quidditch world cup" {yea I never heard of it either} is better than PM2, it got a 7.75. And you will never guess who reviewed it, Jeremy and Lisa, the dynamic duo of retards. It's almost as if GI doesn't take reviewing seriously, it's like they just throw scores out there without much thought.

My little cousins have that Quidditch game. They love it.


They're also super-hardcore Harry Potter fans.

Lol, that's cool!! Btw, I wasn't "dissing" that game, I just wanted to use that for a comparison, and as proof of there hypocrisy.

I didn't take it that you dissed it, I'm just mentioning that someone I know owns the game.

But you're all right - reviewers should have a personal opinion, not what they think the public would like. After all, THEY'RE the ones reviewing the game. Each person can do that individually, I don't want other people telling me what I think.