Exclusive new Sonic game for Wii and Earthbound anyone??

The fact of the matter is is that, there is nothing to counter that which I said dealing with Sonic. Obviously, if you have played any Sonic title then you are commanded to get this one!

----------------------------------
Yes it does command that there is guaranteed fulfillment that the KH3 will appear on the PS3! There are no ifs, ands, or buts, about it.

AND

Bad Graphics equal bad story, if the entire story is told through cutscenes and they choose a color that conflicts with the background of the dialogue box, and then has a font that cant be read, then that means you wont know the story thus you have a bad experience in both story and graphics.

The story does matter, the reason why people buy remakes and or ports with added features is because they add additional features, thus these are the ones to get versus the ones on the original systems because there is more story, thus you are getting the full fledged experience.
 
What are you talking about?

I have yet to find any article that proves any of what I said False.
There is nothing that claims that Tails and Knuckles wont be playable
There is nothing that says that it wont involve motion controls
THere is nothing that says that it is not taking place in a storybook world
There is nothing that says that it wont involve swordfighting
There is nothing that says that it wont have a world that is large and expansive

That simply is enough to force its way onto anyone wishlist, what more do you need to know?! PRice, date of release, cost of production, First Personal Assitant to the Executive of the Cleaning crew of Sega of America?!
Click to expand...

Burden of Proof. Unless you have undeniable proof about this game, you can't say "prove me wrong" when you haven't proven yourself right first.

KH will be on PS3 becasue there is a large base of PS3 owners now, the game can take full advantage of the large size of the Blu-Ray discs, the expansive experience in new Sound Technology, the innovative control scheme, and the easy access of the PSN. What more reasons could there be as to why it wouldnt be on PS3?!
Click to expand...

PS3 has a large base?

If the PS3 base is large, then what does the Wii fall under?
 
Starrynite said:
The fact of the matter is is that, there is nothing to counter that which I said dealing with Sonic. Obviously, if you have played any Sonic title then you are commanded to get this one!

----------------------------------
Yes it does command that there is guaranteed fulfillment that the KH3 will appear on the PS3! There are no ifs, ands, or buts, about it.

AND

Bad Graphics equal bad story, if the entire story is told through cutscenes and they choose a color that conflicts with the background of the dialogue box, and then has a font that cant be read, then that means you wont know the story thus you have a bad experience in both story and graphics.

The story does matter, the reason why people buy remakes and or ports with added features is because they add additional features, thus these are the ones to get versus the ones on the original systems because there is more story, thus you are getting the full fledged experience.
Click to expand...

but there's nothing to prove your claims are true either... they are just possibilities but we don't know if they are right.

show me an example of a game that has a background that conflicts with the font... because i have never seen something like that.....not from a game with a good story at least...

bad graphics =/= bad story... if that was true then books wouldn't have good stories because books have no graphics XD.

never said the story didn't matter.... and if you want remakes and ports why not wait for the remake of this sonic game XD?
 
The books I read do have graphics. Dont you read Nonfiction books, or books with illustrations, graphic novels?

If there is one thing wrong with a game then everything is wrong with the game. You cant enjoy your car if the tires are flat while everything else works, or similarily if the Story is heavlily cliched and predictable while the game has the latest and best in the graphics sector. Or vicey versus, a game that is heavily outdated on a Next-gen system with lazy and horrific graphics, lackluster textures, et and bland character designs, but has a story that could be the next best writing since the ever popular JK Rowling Harry Potter series. Ultimately, the same can exist in the other dimension, a game with the same bland graphics and a story that is utterly predictable and seemed like a 6 month old baby could create out of just simply burping.

Bad graphics always equal bad story, good graphics always equal great story. It is the way it has been since the beginning of time itself

----------------------------------------

Because this Sonic game will be unlike any other and because it has the features I already listed, we are commanded and demanded to buy it. I cant simply wait for a remake and port, I must get it on day one. Sonic and a Sword!!!! Thats like eating your favorite meal on the best location on Earth.

---------------------------------------
And to resolve the KH and PS3--PS3 has a large expansive base of KH fans, Wii doesnt have a large base of KH fans because there is no KH on the Wii or even on a Nintendo CONSOLE (GBA and DS dont count casue they are handhelds and not part of the KH trilogy). PS3 is currently the only one that has this large fan base of KH fans thus it is more beneficial to get it on PS3, plus the option of transferring all old date from the PS2 save files to the PS3 feature can only work on the Ps3, it cant work on the Wii unfortunately. So the Wii is ruled out.
 
Starrynite said:
The books I read do have graphics. Dont you read Nonfiction books, or books with illustrations, graphic novels?

If there is one thing wrong with a game then everything is wrong with the game. You cant enjoy your car if the tires are flat while everything else works, or similarily if the Story is heavlily cliched and predictable while the game has the latest and best in the graphics sector. Or vicey versus, a game that is heavily outdated on a Next-gen system with lazy and horrific graphics, lackluster textures, et and bland character designs, but has a story that could be the next best writing since the ever popular JK Rowling Harry Potter series. Ultimately, the same can exist in the other dimension, a game with the same bland graphics and a story that is utterly predictable and seemed like a 6 month old baby could create out of just simply burping.

Bad graphics always equal bad story, good graphics always equal great story. It is the way it has been since the beginning of time itself

----------------------------------------

Because this Sonic game will be unlike any other and because it has the features I already listed, we are commanded and demanded to buy it. I cant simply wait for a remake and port, I must get it on day one. Sonic and a Sword!!!! Thats like eating your favorite meal on the best location on Earth.

---------------------------------------
And to resolve the KH and PS3--PS3 has a large expansive base of KH fans, Wii doesnt have a large base of KH fans because there is no KH on the Wii or even on a Nintendo CONSOLE (GBA and DS dont count casue they are handhelds and not part of the KH trilogy). PS3 is currently the only one that has this large fan base of KH fans thus it is more beneficial to get it on PS3, plus the option of transferring all old date from the PS2 save files to the PS3 feature can only work on the Ps3, it cant work on the Wii unfortunately. So the Wii is ruled out.
Click to expand...

let's just forget it... i don't agree with you, i don't think there's something out yet that tells me this game is a MUST HAVE and i don't think square-enix has revealed any info on KH3 being released in any console yet.
 
Starrynite said:
Bad graphics always equal bad story, good graphics always equal great story. It is the way it has been since the beginning of time itself
Click to expand...

I'm just gonna throw in my .02 cause I'm too tired from work and just say that the statement right there makes no sense at all. Of course, I am old enough to own a system before the PS2 though, so graphics does NOT make any game in my eyes.
 
Good graphics = good story? Um...no? The Final Fantasy SNES games would like a word with you.
 
What?

Sonic is a must have for it has Sonic in it...what is so hard to understand about this concept, Ive never known anyone to buy a Sonic game because Sonic wasnt the main character.

KH3 there has been plenty of news about it releasing on consoles, you just havent found it.

And

I will admit that the 2 cents that countered my statement, possibly do make cents, I guess I was making a blunder when I typed that. BUt everyone gets the picture bad graphics dont benefit a game
 
Sonic is a must have for it has Sonic in it...
Click to expand...
That makes it a must not, actually.
what is so hard to understand about this concept, Ive never known anyone to buy a Sonic game because Sonic wasnt the main character.
Click to expand...
Wouldn't be a Sonic game if he wasn't, genius.
KH3 there has been plenty of news about it releasing on consoles, you just havent found it.
Click to expand...
And you haven't shown it.
I will admit that the 2 cents that countered my statement, possibly do make cents, I guess I was making a blunder when I typed that. BUt everyone gets the picture bad graphics dont benefit a game
Click to expand...
But odds are, you think 'bad' just means low polys. Super Mario Bros. Next poorly thought statement?
 
SMB wasnt bad, it pushed the technology limits of the system it was on, on a system wide basis it was graphically impressive for the NES...

Sonic in a Sonic Game is a must buy
Sonic not in a Sonic Game is a must not buy
Therefore, if a game has sonic in it, it is a must buy.
 
Starrynite said:
SMB wasnt bad, it pushed the technology limits of the system it was on, on a system wide basis it was graphically impressive for the NES...

Sonic in a Sonic Game is a must buy
Sonic not in a Sonic Game is a must not buy
Therefore, if a game has sonic in it, it is a must buy.
Click to expand...

if sonic is not on it is not called sonic =/, and the name of a game doesn't make it a must buy
 
Starrynite said:
SMB wasnt bad, it pushed the technology limits of the system it was on, on a system wide basis it was graphically impressive for the NES...
Click to expand...
No, SMB3 was. SMB1 was not.
 
Sonic in Super Smash Brothers Brawl was not a must buy
Sonic in Sonic and the Secret Rings was a must buy.

Thus if a game has Sonic in the title it is a must buy!

I dont see what is so hard to grasp about this concept?

And graphics on SMB is beyond the point, we are in the technology age now. Wii PS3 and Xbox 360 is what is hot now.
 
Starrynite said:
Sonic in Super Smash Brothers Brawl was not a must buy
Sonic in Sonic and the Secret Rings was a must buy.

Thus if a game has Sonic in the title it is a must buy!

I dont see what is so hard to grasp about this concept?
Click to expand...
Oh, that would be Sonic Team failing to make good games.
And graphics on SMB is beyond the point, we are in the technology age now. Wii PS3 and Xbox 360 is what is hot now.
Click to expand...
You don't even know how to define technology. Technology is anything that makes things easier. A rock used to break open a crab thousands of years ago is technology. There's no technology age, that's just stupid.
 
Sonic has been on a downward spiral since going 3D. Was Sonic Heroes good? No. Was Sonic Riders good? No. How many recent sonic games have been good? None, except Rush according to some. If a game has Sonic's name in it does it mean it's good? No. Your logic is so flawed. Only a person that was blinded by titles and the mainstream would think that.

A game doesn't need graphics to be good.
 
Sonic Team has never failed to make good games. They make profit on all their games thus their good.

IF the company has made profit then clearl the series wasnt on a downward spiral. Why keep producing games if they cant make sales nor profit. I dont see what issue is in 3D. They have all done good!

And also, to make it more clear, we are in the in silico age.
 
Rush would have been a lot better, but it relied on bottomless pits too often.

Edit: So many of the words you post are missing letters/wrong that I can't understand half the crap you say.
 
fhqwhgads said:
Rush would have been a lot better, but it relied on bottomless pits too often.

Edit: So many of the words you post are missing letters/wrong that I can't understand half the crap you say.
Click to expand...

rush adventure fixed that problem =D....but it had a different director XD
 
Sales make a game good? Again that logic is flawed. Games like Odin Sphere didn't get good sales and yet the game was amazing. We've been through this in another topic.
 
But Sales go against the saying that:

"Sonic has died since he has entered the 3D age" and "Every Sonic game as of late is a complete and utter failure" and "Sonic games of this day and time are just not like they used too"

Adopting everyone else viewpoint it is apparently a sin to play sonic games during this age of mediocrity. Just because you feel that Sonic has experience an aging doesnt mean the games are bad or that the game is tragically flawed and unenjoyable. I as well as the masses of others who have contributed to the reapings of Sonic games have a different perspective, one of actually enjoyable and having fun with our games. You can keep your ratings, and reviews, and raving abouts flaws, but I will just sit and enjoy my game.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top