MGS1 on XBLA??

Strubes said:
I guess the majority of gamers are reading into this too much then.

yes indeed they are, i guess they just ASSUMED they were attacking the 360 by saying the ps3's full name, when in reality they mean MGS1 (it had 2 CDs )
 
Zidart said:
yes indeed they are, i guess they just ASSUMED they were attacking the 360 by saying the ps3's full name, when in reality they mean MGS1 (it had 2 CDs )

Proof that it meant MGS1?

Homicidal Cherry53 said:
Apparently they are, although I have no clue where you found out that the majority of gamers think that Kojima was taking a shot at the 360.

Maybe not the majority, but I know thousands think that at least. I know that much.
 
Strubes said:
Proof that it meant MGS1?

Maybe not the majority, but I know thousands think that at least. I know that much.

easy.

fisrt the fact that in MGS1 the discs were labeled Disc 1 and Disc 2 like the video said, and obviously you have to swap them , then he said that they are in playstation 3 with blu-ray disc and is dual-layered (no signs of anything microsoft related bashing or anything) then he says "what an AGE we live in huh snake?" no words of "we are not in the 360" nor "we are on a sony console this time" or anything like that, and remember that the only game in MGS that you had to swap discs was number 1.

therefore it is possible that both MGS1 and MGS4 go to the XBLA/360 becuase of the fact that there is nothing that proves is completely exclusive for the ps3.
 
Zidart said:
easy.

fisrt the fact that in MGS1 the discs were labeled Disc 1 and Disc 2 like the video said, and obviously you have to swap them , then he said that they are in playstation 3 with blu-ray disc and is dual-layered (no signs of anything microsoft related bashing or anything) then he says "what an AGE we live in huh snake?" no words of "we are not in the 360" nor "we are on a sony console this time" or anything like that, and remember that the only game in MGS that you had to swap discs was number 1.

therefore it is possible that both MGS1 and MGS4 go to the XBLA/360 becuase of the fact that there is nothing that proves is completely exclusive for the ps3.

And nowhere in that I hear any valid proof of Otacon commenting on the PS1.
 
Strubes said:
And nowhere in that I hear any valid proof of Otacon commenting on the PS1.

the fact that he forgot he's in playstation 3 and there's no need to swap like in metal gear 1.....where else have you seen a metal gear where you need to swap discs like that??? nowhere that's your valid proof.

what they are also donig (and is very obvious) is that they are praising the ps3, but again i think 360 fans just acted a bit paranoid and thought this was an attack towards microsoft and besides there is not even a hint of that happening.
 
Strubes said:
And nowhere in that I hear any valid proof of Otacon commenting on the PS1.
And nowhere in any of your posts did I hear valid proof that he was commenting on the 360. You can't use lack of solid evidence to weaken our argument if you're having the exact same problem.
 
Homicidal Cherry53 said:
And nowhere in any of your posts did I hear valid proof that he was commenting on the 360. You can't use lack of solid evidence to weaken our argument if you're having the exact same problem.

I never said it was set in stone. :lol

Just my opinion. And yours, is different. Neither of ours is more believable than the other. Well, I'm sure most people will side with you guys on this forum, but that's beyond the point. :)
 
Strubes said:
I never said it was set in stone. :lol
Neither did anyone else. Look back in the thread, and you will see that almost all of Zi, myself or anyone else's posts have the word "I think" (or some variation) in them. You asked for proof of an opinion, and I had to point out that you had no proof backing your opinion either.

Honestly, you're acting as though we're trying to force our opinions on you or something, when in actuality, we're merely defending them whenever you bring up a point against them (i.e, The majority of gamers think this, he called it a SONY PS3, do you have any proof?).
 
Homicidal Cherry53 said:
Neither did anyone else. Look back in the thread, and you will see that almost all of Zi, myself or anyone else's posts have the word "I think" (or some variation) in them. You asked for proof of an opinion, and I had to point out that you had no proof backing your opinion either.

Honestly, you're acting as though we're trying to force our opinions on you or something, when in actuality, we're merely defending them whenever you bring up a point against them (i.e, The majority of gamers think this, he called it a SONY PS3, do you have any proof?).

And this all could have been summed up in one sentence:

"Only time will tell".

I don't THINK that it will be out for the 360
I don't THINK that MGS1 will make it out to XBLA either
I do THINK that Hideo was taking a stab at the 360

And that about sums up my thoughts. :lol
 
Strubes said:
And this all could have been summed up in one sentence:

"Only time will tell".

I don't THINK that it will be out for the 360
I don't THINK that MGS1 will make it out to XBLA either
I do THINK that Hideo was taking a stab at the 360

And that about sums up my thoughts. :lol
Awesome, but you shouldn't get so annoyed over a debate you initiated. Honestly, you could have said that a page ago, left it at that, and not tried to change our opinions and we wouldn't even be in this situation.
 
Irritated? Hardly. It's a video game forum...lol. The other forum I'm at is alot more harsh than this one. I guess that makes it fun though. Just getting my point across is all. :)
 
I would think they would wait to put it out on the next xbox system. it would seem more logical to do it then with even better graphics and whatnot
 
Back
Top