Strubes said:
Yep, I'm absolutely positive...I've learned it from numerous sources..but my Engine Tech teacher seals the deal. He knows his stuff.
Hope I helped in some way
yes you did
I am going to do a test to see how much of an advantage... I Am draining the tank close to E, then I am going to fill up with 93 Octane... and see how much extra MPG is seen.
I am a bit worried though... after reading the articles about engines that took 87 octane could be hurt by burning premium in them. Even though the Honda people said its is perfectly ok.... I am a little worried about it. I am sure 1 tank wouldn't hurt it... but if it made a decent increase in mpg and I decided to keep on doing it... I don't want to hurt the engine in anyway. I'd like to get AT LEAST 10 years out of this car as I did with my Mustang
The thing about the Mustang GT's from 95... since that was the newer body style (before the 99-00 revision) it still looked really good. It was sort-of odd looking back at the boxier looking Mustangs after seeing the newer sleeker mustangs.... but the 95 body style is very nice IMO.
It is also weird going from a Mustang all my life to a Honda Accord.... Even though it is a sportier ride, it still doesn't have the feel of the stang :lol
my mustang was only 215 Horse (yes, the gt), BUT the torque was arond 300..... that was really nice.
The honda is 245 horse, but only 211 torque or something like that. It is a quick car though. The shifting has taken me a little time to get used to. I am still getting used to it. the 1st gear kicks in a little high in the clutch. The rest of the gears are ok. I miss the engine sound of the stang. The honda is pretty quiet.... it has a little bit of a growl though.... which is nice

Mostly in 1st gear though. Hey, it is a nice v6 though.
I'll try to take some pics and post them. I am going to post some pics of my stang as well.
BV :hat