The PS3 has been robbed!!!

Retro Hero said:
Also, who's to say the PS3 isn't better at it?

:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
 
Hinesmdc said:
no....it was good on 360, but the wii version sucked cause it was rushed, not cause of the controls. and if you find a system with better motion controls than the wii, contact me.




n00b.
I'm the n00b, huh? Well, just having something doesn't make it good. Some people say that Pirates motion control is tiring, but oh no! It's the only one that has it, so it must be awesome! Call of Duty 3, gotta love its forced motion controls! Yes, they're so great. Red Steels overly sensitive aiming? The best ever.
 
Retro Hero said:
Have you PLAYED the PS3? No? Then stop being ignorant.

yes, many times. its motion controls feel tacky and slapped on



fhqwhgads said:
I'm the n00b, huh? Well, just having something doesn't make it good. Some people say that Pirates motion control is tiring, but oh no! It's the only one that has it, so it must be awesome! Call of Duty 3, gotta love its forced motion controls! Yes, they're so great. Red Steels overly sensitive aiming? The best ever.

1. who cares about pirates? its a movie game.

2. call of duty 3s motion controls arnt forced, unless of course, your biasing that on a review you read somewhere.

3. again with the redsteel bashing! so a review said it sucked! get over it! its a good game!
 
Dart said:
I'm not talking about different controls or graphics. I am talking about slightly different gameplay. It could be an extra level or stage, slightly different weapons choices, etc. Something different that gives it a level of exclusivity while still being a multi console game.

Oh. I don't really see that happening and with third party devs going cross-console, it will probably come down to the first-party exclusives consoles have so unless Microsoft buys every dev in the world (which is unlikely cause they will probably just buy the entire world), Nintendo may be able to dominate.
 
Homicidal Cherry53 said:
Oh. I don't really see that happening and with third party devs going cross-console, it will probably come down to the first-party exclusives consoles have so unless Microsoft buys every dev in the world (which is unlikely cause they will probably just buy the entire world), Nintendo may be able to dominate.

Nintendo won't dominate. It's already starting to get really slow. Maybe it'll pick up with a few games but it's not going to have a ton of new games that'll blow our minds. It'll end up just like the Cube...where they make newer versions of older games...and people get bored.
 
Strubes said:
Nintendo won't dominate. It's already starting to get really slow. Maybe it'll pick up with a few games but it's not going to have a ton of new games that'll blow our minds. It'll end up just like the Cube...where they make newer versions of older games...and people get bored.

I smell skepticism. So who's to say that Nintendo won't dominate? (besides you of course) Well I've got news for ya, PS3 definitely won't dominate. Not with a $600 pricetag at least. PS3 will most certainly not end up like the successful, worthy, *cough* regular disk format *cough*, PS2. As far as sales, no. The Wii will probably not catch up to the 360 sales. Not anytime soon anyway. But as far as being advanced in the videogame industry, yes.
 
Jack said:
I smell skepticism. So who's to say that Nintendo won't dominate? (besides you of course) Well I've got news for ya, PS3 definitely won't dominate. Not with a $600 pricetag at least. PS3 will most certainly not end up like the successful, worthy, *cough* regular disk format *cough*, PS2. As far as sales, no. The Wii will probably not catch up to the 360 sales. Not anytime soon anyway. But as far as being advanced in the videogame industry, yes.

spoken like a true gamer 8) 8) 8)


1000 posts!!!
 
Hinesmdc said:
yes, many times. its motion controls feel tacky and slapped on



1. who cares about pirates? its a movie game.

Still a game.

2. call of duty 3s motion controls arnt forced, unless of course, your biasing that on a review you read somewhere.

No, I do this thing called play games. It's really not surprising that one of the first FPSs with motion control is flawed, it's actually pretty expected.

3. again with the redsteel bashing! so a review said it sucked! get over it! its a good game!

Yes, so once again, guess I'm a reviewer. See first sentence of CoD 3.
 
Strubes said:
Nintendo won't dominate. It's already starting to get really slow. Maybe it'll pick up with a few games but it's not going to have a ton of new games that'll blow our minds. It'll end up just like the Cube...where they make newer versions of older games...and people get bored.

Sorry, I guess my message wasn't clear. I never said Nintendo would dominate this generation, but if third party developers were to stop making exclusives and it just came down to first-party, Nintendo would probably do quite well. 8)

EDIT: And since everyone is arguing about what will dominate, I will tell you all that its likely that all consoles will do well.
 
Sony just announced a well-predicted "price point adjustment", meaning they're about to drop the price. According to G4, SCE has already lost $488 million this year and would have lost more if the PS2 wasn't selling so well. Maybe they can pull the rabbit out of the proverbial hat with the PS3 but they need more software to sell units. Even if they drop it to $400 most folks still won't invest until some decent games start coming.

Only software makes hardware successful, no matter how shiny the box.
 
PS2 > PS3

People realized that. No matter how advanced they tried to be and how much Sony tried to push Blu-Ray on us all, it doesn't mean a thing when PS2 is still churning out quality games.

Of course, both are Sony so it doesn't harm them, but they should focus on actually getting some great games out on the PS3.
 
They're losing money on the PS3, why would they lower the price? So they could lose more? Genius.
 
fhqwhgads said:
They're losing money on the PS3, why would they lower the price? So they could lose more? Genius.

Sony is getting better at making the PS3, more efficient, so it costs less money, so they will lower the price so more people will buy it and they'll still lose the same amount per console, then make it up on the games. Such is the way things always go...except with Microsoft. A year and a half and no price drop? >:(
 
Back
Top