stealth toilet
Moderator
Anyone who goes to the GC forums know's this already, but here's the scoop.
My GC crapped out on me the other day and left me with a giant stack of unplayable games. I'm planning on trading these in to get a new system, my only problem is I can't decide which one to get.
I'm not sure if I should just trade in all my GC games that I don't play, replace my GC, and that way I'd be able to play the new Zelda which I've been waiting for for about 5 years now.
I also kind of want to trade in all of my GC games, get an Xbox, and buy the new Conker game which I have also been yearning to play for about 5 years now.
If I traded in most of my games I could get a GC for almost no extra cost at all. If I trade in all my games I would probably have to shell out a little more cash for an Xbox (especially considering I'd have no games for that system at all).
I don't want this to turn into an "Xbox vs. GC" debate, or a "Zelda vs. Conker" one, because I really don't care which you guys think is better. What I would like to know is what you guys would do in this situation, whether it was your GC, Xbox, or PS2 that died on you.
Would you replace the system that crapped out on you for no cost, even though it would mean a much smaller library of games than you originally had? Or, would trade in all your owned games, get a new system, spend a little more money, and thus get the chance to play all the games you missed out on?
My GC crapped out on me the other day and left me with a giant stack of unplayable games. I'm planning on trading these in to get a new system, my only problem is I can't decide which one to get.
I'm not sure if I should just trade in all my GC games that I don't play, replace my GC, and that way I'd be able to play the new Zelda which I've been waiting for for about 5 years now.
I also kind of want to trade in all of my GC games, get an Xbox, and buy the new Conker game which I have also been yearning to play for about 5 years now.
If I traded in most of my games I could get a GC for almost no extra cost at all. If I trade in all my games I would probably have to shell out a little more cash for an Xbox (especially considering I'd have no games for that system at all).
I don't want this to turn into an "Xbox vs. GC" debate, or a "Zelda vs. Conker" one, because I really don't care which you guys think is better. What I would like to know is what you guys would do in this situation, whether it was your GC, Xbox, or PS2 that died on you.
Would you replace the system that crapped out on you for no cost, even though it would mean a much smaller library of games than you originally had? Or, would trade in all your owned games, get a new system, spend a little more money, and thus get the chance to play all the games you missed out on?