what do you guys think??
It's not uncommon. It usually only takes 2 or 3 years for PC games to start surpassing the capabilities of nex-gen systems, in terms of graphics.Sideshow116 said:that sucks, are we already making games that are out of reach for the next gen systems??? that's not good.
Yeah but, graphics aren't the only thing that are effected by hardware.Strubes said:Doesn't matter. Graphics don't make a game, right?![]()
Strubes said:Doesn't matter. Graphics don't make a game, right?![]()
True, but my statement applies to more than just graphics. The PC gains an overall hardware advantage, over time, which has advantages outside of graphics, and that is what I was getting at with my post, although I only mentioned graphics, so I understand you talking specifically graphics.Strubes said:I was talking about the "in terms of graphics" statement guys. :lol
Yeah, they gave it a 9.4. :lolHinesmdc said:actually, i hear crysis isnt good at all
xplayu gave it a 3
ign gave it a lower score, im not sure what tho
Hinesmdc said:actually, i hear crysis isnt good at all
Fr0dus Maximus said:You hear its bad. Ive played and let me tell u something. Playing Crysis is so much different than hearing a bout it, naw what I sayin?