Bluevoodu
Site Founder
quitter :lolStrubes said:Instead of responding with a huge, drawn out argument, I'll just say...I respectfully disagree.![]()
j/k
†B†V† :hat
quitter :lolStrubes said:Instead of responding with a huge, drawn out argument, I'll just say...I respectfully disagree.![]()
Bluevoodu said:quitter :lol
j/k
†B†V† :hat
Zidart said:unless someone gives me a valid reason why gamestop should continue with this unnecessary process and continue with their unethical procedures then i won't change my mind on the subject.... as i stated in my post above i would be fine with a minimal amount of words and actions.... but why can't that even be accomplished by gamestop? i shall never know...
what i don't understand is why would someone be OK with this sort of action... if people don't care whether or not they are getting used games.... why object for a change that will still give you "games that play like new" literally....
Strubes said:*sigh*...why must you go on and on? If the game doesn't have a scratch, and the case is perfect...it is worthy of my full payment for the game. You don't understand why I'm thinking the way I'm thinking, and I can't understand why a piece of plastic means the game should be charged as used to you. But don't bother explaining, because it DOESN'T MATTER. :lol
Mai Valentine said:I always informed a customer if the game was a gutted copy. And I even asked if they would like it shrink-wrapped. I think it's part of the training to let people know when a game is a gut copy. If someone sells a gut but doesn't explain why it's already open, then that's just poor training.
Strubes said:*sigh*...why must you go on and on? If the game doesn't have a scratch, and the case is perfect...it is worthy of my full payment for the game. You don't understand why I'm thinking the way I'm thinking, and I can't understand why a piece of plastic means the game should be charged as used to you. But don't bother explaining, because it DOESN'T MATTER. :lol
mastermario said:Car sales are the same way. As soon as you drive it off the lot, it loses some of its value. Doesn't have a scratch, but its been used.
Would you buy a gallon of milk if the seal had been broken? You just don't know what has happened to the milk, all you know is that its been opened before. Maybe someone barfed in it, or maybe they just smelled it. I don't wanna take the risk.
I dunno man...people seal things for a reason. I want a new game to be my game and my game only, noone else touching it.
mastermario said:Dude, I'm just saying, it would not be difficult to put even the littlest of scratches on it if it were played before you owned it. You or someone else may not notice it, but it would still be there. How is that no damage to the game? Even if it caused just a little baby skip in a cutscene or something? Why would you want to inspect a brand new game for scratches like that, when you shouldn't even be concerned since it should be perfect? You have no idea if them playing it might have caused damage to the game or not. I would never ever ever want to risk it.
Strubes said:I always check my games...and if there's a little scratch..I'll see it. Haven't had it happen. And even then...you still wouldn't know if it was played or not. It was just opened. It's like they say "hey, we played this copy."
mastermario said:Dude, I'm just saying, it would not be difficult to put even the littlest of scratches on it if it were played before you owned it. You or someone else may not notice it, but it would still be there. How is that no damage to the game? Even if it caused just a little baby skip in a cutscene or something? Why would you want to inspect a brand new game for scratches like that, when you shouldn't even be concerned since it should be perfect? You have no idea if them playing it might have caused damage to the game or not. I would never ever ever want to risk it.
aleeock157 said:Why don't we all just agree to disagree? :lol Y'all just keep arguing the same points back and forth, and nobody's going to convince anybody to think otherwise.
aleeock157 said:Why don't we all just agree to disagree? :lol Y'all just keep arguing the same points back and forth, and nobody's going to convince anybody to think otherwise.
I can never agree to that this is why we come to message boards to have stupid arguements that will never end.aleeock157 said:Why don't we all just agree to disagree? :lol Y'all just keep arguing the same points back and forth, and nobody's going to convince anybody to think otherwise.
Zidart said:instead of just dismissing our claims, comparisons, ideas and situations why don't you try to prove your point or defend it somehow, tell us why you really think this "issue" shouldn't be solved at all....
i mean after all even if gamestop stops selling used games as new ones.... would that really affect you at all?
Zidart said:unless someone gives me a valid reason why gamestop should continue with this unnecessary process and continue with their unethical procedures then i won't change my mind on the subject.... as i stated in my post above i would be fine with a minimal amount of words and actions.... but why can't that even be accomplished by gamestop? i shall never know...
what i don't understand is why would someone be OK with this sort of action... if people don't care whether or not they are getting used games.... why object for a change that will still give you "games that play like new" literally....