F
fhqwhgads
Lurker
Debating which will be better and whatnot.
I found an excellent quote on another forum, so here it is.
I found an excellent quote on another forum, so here it is.
Do you really trust a company that is claiming to be making the first ever game that has guitar, vocals, and drums yet it is being released 11 months after the first Rock Band?
Activision will do with Guitar Hero what it does with all their series, drive them into the ground with sequels. Just look at Tony Hawk and Call of Duty. Both have had great games, but the number of sequels is becoming ridiculous (FYI a Tony Hawk sequel has been released at least once a year, Call of Duty is following that path with number 6 already known about).
Guitar Hero World Tour will have some great songs. They will be poorly charted (not necessarily to be more difficult, just poor) and there will be lack-luster features to go along with them. Activision will advertise out the wazoo and every gamer from junior high to 45 will know what Guitar Hero is. Being relatively uneducated consumers, they will buy them like they are going out of style.
Now lets look at HMX. They come out, some-what surprisingly announce a sequel for this year, but then say that they are fixing many of the problems/quirks with the first game, while adding new and expanded features. They come out and tell everyone they are addressing the concerns of their fan base. Then they announce that all the 200+ DLC songs you have spent money on will transfer right over to the next game seamlessly, something no other developer has ever done before in any genre (granted it isn't practical in many situations).
You would be hard pressed to find another game developer like Harmonix.
Between GH3 and RB, as far as note charts, UI, features and so on Rock Band felt and played like a superior game (ignoring the fact it is multiple instruments vs one). I have a feeling the results will be similar come this fall.